> Forest of True Sight > Questions & Answers Reload this Page Classes
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005, 08:27 PM // 20:27   #1
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default Classes

Hi. I have a Ranger atm (still in pre). I wonder what would be a good secondary to complement it for PvE. I'm choosing between Mesmer or Necromancer. I would also like you to consider that if I choose Necro as my secondary on my Ranger I will have to go Mesmer on my Elementalist, so it gotta fit there as well, as I already decided for a cookie cutter W/Mo for my 3rd slot :P.

Please help me out
Senedai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2005, 08:50 PM // 20:50   #2
Master of Beasts
 
Epinephrine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Guild: Servants of Fortuna [SoF]
Default

Don't go Wa/Mo :P Resist the urge....

Rangers don't *need* a secondary, but it can be helpful. I'd lean toward mesmer given those two options - while the necromancer has some decent skills (curses in particular for a ranger) I think that you'll get more use out of the defensive stances (Mantra of Frost+Winter for example, Physical Resistance) and hex/interrupt prevention (Hex Breaker, Mantra of Resolve) than you will from the other.

Remembering that Ranger expertise affects skills though, Vampiric Touch starts looking like decent self preservation/damage. Mesmers offer Blackout for example, but you are less likely to make use of that in PvE. Baiscally, either has good options, it's a preference thing.
Epinephrine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2005, 09:02 PM // 21:02   #3
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Default

I know Rangers really dont need a secondary, I was just thinking of unlocking all the skills with 3 chars (4th is PVP) and then I need a combination. I haven't actually planned on using anything beside Ranger skills anyway :P. But I'm leaning towards Mesmer. Would E/N be viable in PVE?
Senedai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2005, 09:17 PM // 21:17   #4
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Profession: W/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senedai
I already decided for a cookie cutter W/Mo for my 3rd slot :P.
Hi,

I played the game for 4 months, I only have one character, and that is a W/Mo, still didn't master it yet.

Not sure what u mean by a cookie-cutter W/Mo, just play the game and works things out for yourself

Wish people would stop bashing W/Mo
Big.Wayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2005, 10:18 PM // 22:18   #5
Forge Runner
 
DeanBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arizona
Guild: Wizardry Players Guild, http://4guildwars.7.forumer.com
Default

You may find that you play an elementalist like a ranger - with little from the 2nd profession being used. So ele/necro is fine. Investing in blood magic can provide some healing that is lacking on the elem side.
DeanBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2005, 10:34 PM // 22:34   #6
Hell's Protector
 
Jetdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Guild: The Eyes of Texas [BEVO]
Profession: D/A
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big.Wayne
Wish people would stop bashing W/Mo
W/Mo is by far the best warrior soloing class in PvE. In group PvE, not so good because its skills focus on self healing. In PvP, it's not so great at all.

I love my W/Mo for the first reason above.
Jetdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2005, 06:40 AM // 06:40   #7
Desert Nomad
 
Sereng Amaranth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: The Amazon Basin [AB]
Default

Ranger/Monk = Judge's Insight + Ignite Arrows
Ranger/Monk = Judge's Insight + Barrage

Ranger/Necro = Necros have touch skills that are affected by Expertise.

Ranger/Elementalist = Conjure Flame/Lighting/Ice (not the best)

Ranger/Mesmer = Echo + Choking Gas = eternal interruption

Ranger/Warrior = I've never even considered it. Is it viable?
Sereng Amaranth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2005, 06:59 AM // 06:59   #8
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
merty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Guild: Order Of the Flying Dragon
Profession: R/Mo
Default

As a Ranger (and beginner of this game), I started with Ranger/Warrior, thinking that I could manage melee and far distance attack whenever suited. However, I soon found out that for a Ranger it is easier/better to just stick to bow/beast attacks, making it insuitable for close range things.

Because a Ranger has high lvl armor, low energy costs, high range attack things, I often found myself the only "survivor" of a PVE group. If only I had rez that can be used multiple times.... Therefore I changed my 2nd to monk. That way, I could also help to 'monk around', because lot of times there is no or not very good monk available to do quests/missions. Also, R/Mo makes me a bit more 'self-supporting', so that the monk in a group can focus on the more healing/protection needed teammates, like tanking warriors.

Last but not least. Rangers do have a hard time getting accepted into groups. There are million other threads that focus on that stupid pre-assumption that rangers are less usefull then monks or warriors. However, lot of players do have pre-assumption. Being a monk as second, they might think 'well at least we have a spare-helping-monk'. Of course, once accepted, you will prove you can do much more then that...
merty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2005, 07:29 AM // 07:29   #9
Desert Nomad
 
Shimus DarkRaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Titusville, PA <nowhere>
Guild: KOD <Knights of the Dragonrose><Guild Officer>
Profession: W/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sereng Amaranth

Ranger/Warrior = I've never even considered it. Is it viable?
Very viable. Just take a warriors stances with a rangers ranged capabilities. Need I say more? If things aggro you, bonettis for energy on hit while still focusing on others. R/W are very cool classed if played properly.

--The Shim
Shimus DarkRaven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2005, 07:55 AM // 07:55   #10
Desert Nomad
 
VGJustice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tyria, cappin' ur bosses
Guild: Boston Guild [BG]
Profession: R/W
Default

Why not use a massive +Energy item and Wards for trapping? Drop some traps, aggro the monsters, use Ward Agains Foes, drop Flame Trap... sounds fun to me ^_^

As to the viability of the R/W, it's probably the hardest one to make work well. Melee is an option, but so is the extra defense for Point-Blank Trapping.

Personally, I'd say that R/Mo is probably the most versatile overall. Just don't use Healing Prayers, you get better bang out of Prot and Smite.
VGJustice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2005, 03:30 PM // 15:30   #11
Forge Runner
 
DeanBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arizona
Guild: Wizardry Players Guild, http://4guildwars.7.forumer.com
Default

I've played my Ranger as /warrior and most other professions and found the melee ranger to be fun. The warrior skills are reduced by expertise and most cost 5 so are extremely spammable. You can combine apply poison with cyclone axe or hammer with tigers fury or sword for poison + bleed + deep wound + victory is mine.

Just don't try to mix a bow + melee toon.
DeanBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Share This Forum!  
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yay, more possible classes? Epinephrine Off-Topic & the Absurd 77 Nov 19, 2005 11:35 PM // 23:35
Knido The Riverside Inn 6 Nov 16, 2005 03:47 PM // 15:47
Keough The Riverside Inn 1 Oct 30, 2005 12:01 AM // 00:01
Classes classes classes... Skorn Darkflame Questions & Answers 25 Jun 15, 2005 06:34 PM // 18:34
NoobZor7 Questions & Answers 24 Apr 21, 2005 01:33 AM // 01:33


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:38 AM // 07:38.